2006 Performance Standards for Community Adult Learning Centers
Performance Measure: Attendance
Definition:
- Total number of rate-based attended student hours divided by the total number of planned student hours
Exclusions:
Standard: Programs ensure that students attend between 66% and 76% of total planned student hours.
Purpose:
- Promotes effective outreach, screening, orientation, assessment, placement procedures
- Promotes instruction that is relevant to students' needs
Benchmarks:
| | # of points | Cut Points for Attendance |
| Advanced | 3 | 77% and above |
| Meets Standard | 2 | 66%-76% |
| Needs Improvement | 1 | 55%-65% |
| Remedial Action | 0 | 54% and below |
State Averages for Attendance in Community Adult Learning Centers:
| FY 2006 | 72.59% |
| FY 2005 | 71.70% |
| FY 2004 | 70.65% |
| FY 2003 | 71.35% |
| FY 2002 | 68.27% |
| FY 2001 | 67.42% |
Where This Data Can Be Found:
SMARTT Cognos ReportNet
- Adhoc Reports>> Performance Standards Reports for Community ALC

Performance Measure: Average Attended Hours
Definition:
- Total number of actual attended student hours divided by the total number of students
(Attended hours includes rates based, non-rates based, and volunteer match hours.)
Standard: Programs ensure that students attend between 117 and 131 average attended hours per year.
Purpose:
- Promotes student persistence and learner gain
- Measures intensity of students' instructional time
Benchmarks:
| | # of points | Cut Points for Average Attended Hours |
| Advanced | 3 | 132 and above |
| Meets Standard | 2 | 117-131 |
| Needs Improvement | 1 | 91-116 |
| Remedial Action | 0 | 90 and below |
State Averages for Average Attended Hours in Community Adult Learning Centers:
| FY 2006 | 127.34 |
| FY 2005 | 122.81 |
| FY 2004 | 125.73 |
| FY 2003 | 125.77 |
| FY 2002 | 110.83 |
| FY 2001 | 107.08 |
Where This Data Can Be Found: SMARTT Cognos ReportNet
- Adhoc Reports>> Performance Standards Reports for Community ALC

Performance Measure: Pre and Post Test Percentage
Definition:
- Total number of students who are pre and post tested divided by the total number of students enrolled in a program for the year (based on student's primary assessment)
Exclusions:
- Students with < 12 hours attendance
- Students with an initial scale score in TABE Language > 584
- Students with an initial scale score in MAPT >599
- Students with an intake date after 4/1
Standard: Programs ensure that between 66% and 76% of eligible students are pre- and post-tested.
Note:
- If a program post tests less than 50% of eligible students, performance points for the Learner Gains performance standard are reduced by 50%.
Purpose:
- Promotes retention of students so that students remain in programs long enough to achieve learning gains and goals
Benchmarks:
| # of points | Cut Points for Pre and Post Test Percentage |
| Advanced | 3 | 77% and above |
| Meets Standard | 2 | 66%-76% |
| Needs Improvement | 1 | 55%-65% |
| Remedial Action | 0 | 54% and below |
State Averages for Pre and Post Test Percentage in Community Adult Learning Centers:
| FY 2006 68.5% |
| FY 2005 71.2% |
Where This Data Can Be Found: SMARTT Cognos ReportNet
- Adhoc Reports>> Performance Standards Reports for Community ALC

Performance Measure: Learner Gains
Definition:
- Total percent of students who demonstrate learner gain on TABE, MAPT, REEP, or BEST Plus assessments (based on student's primary assessment)
Significant learner gain for each assessment is defined as:
- TABE: 27 scale score points
- REEP: .4 scale score points
- BEST Plus: 33 scale score points
- Other: 1 GLE (grade level equivalent) for Beginning Literacy
Notes:
- Beginning in FY 2007, the TABE for ABE reading and math was replaced by the MAPT.
- MAPT and TABE Level L (literacy) data will be reviewed by UMass to determine significant learner gain.
- If a program post tests less than 50% of eligible students, performance points awarded for Learner Gains are reduced by 50%
Standard: Programs ensure that between 47% and 56% of students demonstrate significant gain as defined in the table above.
Purpose:
- To capture the learning gains that students achieve
Benchmarks:
| # of points | Cut Points for Learner Gains |
| Advanced | 9 | 57% and above |
| Meets Standard | 6 | 47% - 56% |
| Needs Improvement | 3 | 36% - 46% |
| Remedial Action | 0 | 35% and below |
*Program must post test at least 50% of eligible students to be awarded performance points as above.
State Averages for Learner Gains in Community Adult Learning Centers:
Where This Data Can Be Found: SMARTT Cognos ReportNet
- Adhoc Reports>> Performance Standards Reports for Community ALC

Performance Measure: Setting and Meeting Student Goals
Definition:
- Total number of goals set divided by the number of students enrolled in the program
- Total number of goals met divided by the number of students enrolled in the program
Standard:
- Programs set, on average, at least 2 goals per student per year.
- Programs meet, on average, at least 1 goal per student per year.
- Programs are eligible for Column A, B, and C goal attainment points as noted below.
Notes:
- Programs document goals met according to the Countable Outcomes Definitions and Required Documentation Chart or the Student Goal Sheet.
Purpose:
- Encourages students from across the program to set and meet goals
- Ensures that student goals drive curricula and instruction
Point scoring:
| | # of points | Formula for Awarding Points |
| Goals set | 1 | set at least 2 goals per student |
| Goals met | 2 | meet at least 1 goal per student |
| Column A/B goals | 3 | if the majority (at least 50%) of met goals are column A and B goals, and if program meets at least 1 goal per student, program earns 3 Column A/B points. |
| Column A/B goals | 2 | if the majority (at least 50%) of met goals are column A and B goals, and if program meets less than 1 but at least .5 goals per student, program earns 2 Column A/B points. |
| Column C goals | 1 | if program meets at least 1 column C goal per student, program earns one column C point. |
Benchmarks for Student Goals
| | # of points | |
| Advanced | 5-6 | note: maximum performance points in any combination of the above is six |
| Meets Standard | 3-4 |
| Needs Improvement | 1-2 |
| Remedial Action | 0 |
Where This Data Can Be Found: SMARTT Cognos ReportNet
- Adhoc Reports >> Performance Standards Reports for Community ALC

Performance Measure: Educational Functioning Level Completion
Definition:
- The total number of students completing an Educational Functioning Level (EFL) divided by the total number of enrolled students.
Exclusions:
- High ASE level
- Students with less than 12 hours attendance
Standard:
- Programs meet or exceed the annual state EFL target as negotiated with USDE /li>
Notes:
- ACLS negotiates performance targets annually with USDE based on state performance data from table 4.
Purpose:
- To meet USDE reporting requirements that measure program effectiveness at the state level
Benchmarks for Fiscal Year 2007:
| | # of points | Cut Points for Completing One EFL |
| Meets Standard | 1 | at least 33% of all enrolled students complete one EFL |
| Does not Meet Standard | 0 | less than 33% of all enrolled students complete one EFL |
State Targets for Educational Functioning Level Completion in Community Adult Learning Centers:
| FY 2006 29% |
| FY 2005 28% |
| FY 2004 28% |
| FY 2003 27% |
Where This Data Can Be Found: SMARTT Cognos ReportNet
- Federal Reports >> Table 4 :- Educational Gains and Attendance by Educational Functioning Level
last updated: September 26, 2007
|