Mass.gov
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Go to Selected Program Area
 Massachusetts State Seal
 News  School/District Profiles  School/District Administration  Educator Services  Assessment/Accountability  Family & Community  
 > Administration  Finance/Grants  PK-16 Program Support  Information Services  
>  BESE Home
>  Board Meeting Schedule
>  Board in Brief
>  Board Meeting Minutes
>  BESE Members
>  Board Documents
>  BESE Advisory Councils
>  Chairman's Statements

District/School Administration right arrow Administration right arrow
The Massachusetts Board of Education

Discussion of MTEL Pass Rates Report

To:Members of the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education
From:Jeffrey Nellhaus, Acting Commissioner
Date:April 22, 2008

line

At our meeting in January 2008, Chairman Reville and I provided an overview of statewide initiatives related to teacher effectiveness, including information on An Act Relative to Educator Excellence (H. 451/S. 284); Governor Patrick's Readiness Project on Recruiting and Retaining Educators; the Teaching, Learning and Leading Survey; and preliminary proposals developed by the Board's Educational Personnel Advisory Council (EPAC). We will continue our focus on educator effectiveness at this month's meeting by considering the recommendations of a report forwarded to my attention by EPAC entitled "Recommendations for Addressing Disparities in Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure Scores." The report recommends several steps to close the gap in passing rates between white and minority candidates for licensure.

Background: Licensure of Educators

The licensure of educators is the primary means by which each state ensures that teachers and administrators meet a threshold of knowledge, skills and abilities before they assume the responsibilities of their role. The Massachusetts law on educator licensure, Mass. General Laws c. 71, § 38G, requires all candidates to pass a two-part test (communication and literacy skills plus subject matter knowledge) in order to be eligible for a license. Since 1998, the Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure (MTEL), which are on-demand, written tests, have been used to determine whether candidates possess sufficient reading and writing skills and sufficient knowledge of subject matter (e.g., mathematics, science, foreign language, etc.) relevant to the specific license they are seeking. The assessment of a candidate's actual teaching skills typically takes the form of a performance assessment during the candidate's teaching practicum.

The Commonwealth has a no-cost contract through June 2010 with Evaluation Systems Group of Pearson (formerly National Evaluation Systems) to implement the MTEL program. The 39 MTEL examinations are aligned with our educator licensing regulations and the student learning standards contained in the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks.

MTEL Pass Rates

MTEL pass rates for any single administration of the highest volume tests for first time test takers range from a low of 50% (Early Childhood Education) to a high of 81% (secondary English). Pass rates for those retaking the MTEL are typically much lower, e.g., 26% for Early Childhood and 48% for secondary English.

On May 30, 2007, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education released a report of MTEL pass rates by racial, ethnic and linguistic subgroups. The report indicated that white candidates were passing all MTEL tests at a significantly higher rate than minority candidates. For example, in the 2005-2006 school year, 77 percent of white teacher candidates passed the writing exam, as compared to 46 percent of black and 48 percent of Hispanic test-takers. On the reading exam, 86 percent of white test-takers passed, as compared to 62 percent of black and 61 percent of Hispanic candidates. The May 30th press release and the summary of MTEL pass rate data for 2005-2006 are enclosed as Attachments 1 and 2.

This disparity in pass rates is not unique to Massachusetts. The 2005-06 pass rates for the Praxis II subject tests, an educator licensing test developed by the Educational Testing Service that is widely used in other states, show that for the highest volume subject tests, white candidates' pass rates are approximately 30- 40% higher than for black test takers and approximately 10-30% higher than for Hispanic test takers. Nor is the disparity in pass rates unique to educator licensing tests; the Board and many other education policymakers have acknowledged the persistent achievement gaps in student performance in elementary and secondary schools and are continually seeking to reduce and prevent those gaps.

MTEL Pass Rates Study Group

In response to the May 2007 report, former Commissioner Driscoll called upon the EPAC to convene a working group to consider the disparity in pass rates and develop recommendations for addressing it. EPAC chair Ray Shurtleff (retired Human Resources Director, Boston Public Schools) and member Linda Davis-Delano (Director of Educator Preparation & Licensure, Springfield College), working closely with the Department, convened the MTEL Pass Rates Study Group comprised of representatives from school districts, teacher preparation programs and two testing experts. The Study Group met five times between August 2007 and February 2008. Their report was forwarded to and reviewed by the full EPAC at its February and March 2008 meetings. The report, under a transmittal letter from Ray Shurtleff, is enclosed as Attachment 3. The Study Group's recommendations and our current or proposed actions to address the recommendations are summarized below:

MTEL Pass Rate Study Group RecommendationCurrent and Proposed Actions to Address the Recommendations
1. The Department needs to strengthen the MTEL Technical Report. The Department has been working with Evaluation Systems group of Pearson to include more comprehensive documentation in the MTEL Technical Report.
2. The Department should redevelop the Communication and Literacy Skills writing subtest and subject matter tests as necessary to ensure that the tests focus on the most important knowledge required to effectively satisfy each licensed role. The Department establishes priorities for developing or updating six tests per year. The Communication and Literacy Skills Test (reading and writing) is currently under review and scheduled for updating this year.
3. The Department should collect and report on the diversity of our educator workforce and those enrolled in preparation on an annual basis. The Department is in the process of completing its first educator level data collection, EPIMS. This new collection will provide access to a comprehensive profile of our educators. The Department will work with the Department of Higher Education and approved educator preparation programs to strengthen reporting on candidates enrolled in these programs.
4. The Department should consider alternative means for candidates to demonstrate knowledge competence including the use of other tests and an appeals process for those who score within one "standard error of measure" below the passing score.

This recommendation requires further analysis and discussion by the Department and the Board.

S.271, which has passed in the state Senate and is pending in the House, would provide an appeals process for certain candidates who have come close to passing but have not passed required MTEL tests after taking them three times. A copy of the bill is enclosed as Attachment 4.

If one alternative means would involve using the Praxis test, funding would be required to conduct a comparability study between MTEL and Praxis.

5. Convene a Diversity Summit. This recommendation requires further discussion by the Department and the Board as well as the new Secretary of Education, since the issue concerns higher education and workforce development as well as K-12 education.
6. The Department should consider modifying requirements for the Preliminary License. Currently, this license provides an opportunity to teach to those who meet the knowledge requirements, but not the professional standards. The proposal would provide the same opportunity to those who meet the professional standards, but who have not yet met the knowledge requirements. This recommendation requires further discussion by the Department and the Board.
7. Educator preparation programs, with support from the Department, need to collect and report more comprehensive data on their candidates and work to identify and replicate best practices in preparing them to meet the knowledge requirements.

The Department will provide technical and logistical support to preparation programs as we work with institutions of higher education and other preparation programs to implement this recommendation. The Board included $750,000 in its FY 2009 budget request to develop better diagnostic tools and related supports for those candidates who are working to pass the MTEL examinations.

Further, the Board proposed an additional $5 million for FY 2009 to pilot closer partnerships between school districts and preparation programs.

8. The Governor, State Legislature, and the Departments of Elementary and Secondary Education and Higher Education should work together to significantly enhance the recruitment and retention of a diverse teacher workforce. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education stands ready to work with the Governor, the Secretary of Education, the Legislature, the Department of Higher Education, and others to implement this recommendation.

I look forward to our discussion of these issues.

Attachments:

  1. May 30, 2007 Press Release
  2. MTEL Pass Rate Data, 2005-2006
  3. "Recommendations for Addressing Disparities in Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure Scores" Download PDF Document  Download MS WORD Document and transmittal letter from EPAC chairman Ray Shurtleff
  4. Senate Bill 271


last updated: April 25, 2008
E-mail this page| Print View| Print Pdf  
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Search · Site Map · Policies · Site Info · Contact ESE