Science and Technology/Engineering
American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061 - Technology: A Panel Report, 1989.
American Association for the Advancement of Science, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, Project 2061, 1993.
Association of State Supervisors of Mathematics and National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics. Guide to Selecting Instructional Materials for Mathematics Education. Mountain View, CA: Creative Publications, 1993.
Blank, R. CCSSO and Pechman, E., State Curriculum Frameworks in Mathematics and Science: How are They Changing Across the States?, May 1995.
Boulanger, F.D., Instruction and science learning: A quantitative synthesis, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18: 311-327, 1981.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., and Cocking R., eds., How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.
Communities and Schools for Career Success (CS2) and Corporation for Business, Work, and Learning, Task Force on Education Reform, Integrating School-to-Work with Massachusetts Education Reform, February 1February 7March 27March 30April 12April 13April 1997.
Duckworth, E., The Having of Wonderful Ideas and Other Essays on Teaching and Learning, New York: Teachers College Press, 1987.
International Society for Technology in Education, National Educational Technology Standards for Students, June 1998.
International Technology Education Association, Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology, Reston, Virginia: International Technology Education Association, 2000.
International Technology Education Association and National Science Foundation, Technology for All Americans Project, A Rationale and Structure for the Study of Technology, 1996.
__________, Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology, 2000.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Massachusetts Science and Technology Curriculum Framework, January 1996.
__________, Guide to the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System: Science and Technology, January 1998.
__________, Curriculum Frameworks Implementation Guide: Suggested Tools and Strategies, Draft, July 1998.
__________, PALMS Phase II Program Effectiveness Report 1998-1999, submitted to the National Science Foundation, December 8, 1998.
__________, PALMS Phase II May Report 1998-1999, submitted to the National Science Foundation, May 15, 1999.
National Assessment Governing Board, U. S. Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Science Performance Standards, 1996.
__________, What Do Students Know?, 1996 NAEP Science Results for 4th, 8th and 12th Graders.
National Research Council, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
National Science Foundation, Infusing Equity in Systemic Reform: An Implementation Scheme, Washington, DC, January 1998.
National Science Foundation, Statewide Systemic Initiatives 1998 Program Effectiveness Reviews Report, January 1998.
National Science Resources Center, Criteria for Evaluating Elementary Science Curriculum Materials. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Ralph, J. and Dwyer, M.C., Making the Case: Evidence of Program Effectiveness in Schools and Classrooms, Criteria and Guidelines for the U.S. Department of Education's Program Effectiveness Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 1988.
The Textbook League, The Textbook Letter.
Wright, R., Israel, E., and Lauda, D., A Decision Maker's Guide to Technology Education, Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association, 1993.
Wright, R. Thomas, Technology Systems, Tinley Park, Illinois: The Goodheart-Wilcox Company, Inc., 1996.