A school's 1998 MCAS results will place that school in a performance category for each content area and for overall performance. The baseline performance categories determine the improvement expectations.
At the end of the cycle, a school will receive performance ratings based on the average of the 1999 and 2000 results and improvement ratings based on the comparison of those results to the baseline results (1998).
A school's overall performance and improvement ratings will place it into one box on a 4x6 matrix. The matrix on the back of this page details the state actions associated with each box for the first cycle.
| OVERALL PERFORMANCE |
OVERALL IMPROVEMENT |
| Failed to Meet | Approached | Met | Exceeded |
| Very High | | RECOGNITION for very high performance | RECOGNITION for very high performance and for meeting improvement expectations | RECOGNITION for very high performance and for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program |
| High | | | RECOGNITION for high performance and for meeting improvement expectations | RECOGNITION for high performance and for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program |
| Moderate | WARNING that the school and district must strengthen improvement efforts | | RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations | RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations.Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program |
| Low | WARNING that the school and district must strengthen improvement efforts | WARNING that the school and district must strengthen improvement efforts | RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations | RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program |
| Very Low | REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing. High priority for district support and targeted state assistance | REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing. High priority for district support and targeted state assistance | RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations.High priority for district support and targeted state assistance. | RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program.High priority for district support and targeted state assistance |
| Critically Low | REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing .Top priority for district support and targeted state assistance | REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing .Top priority for district support and targeted state assistance | RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations.High priority for district support and targeted state assistance | RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program. High priority for district support and targeted state assistance |