Mass.gov
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Go to Selected Program Area
 Massachusetts State Seal
 News  School/District Profiles  School/District Administration  Educator Services  Assessment/Accountability  Family & Community  
 Student Assessment  Accountability  Compliance/Monitoring  No Child Left Behind >  
>
>
 
>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
>
 
 
 
 
>
>
>
Contact Us - By Topic | Groups

Archived Information

Assessment/Accountability orange arrow School and District Accountability orange arrow
Adequate Yearly Progress

School Performance Rating Process Overview - 1999

The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will use the MCAS results to rate Massachusetts public schools. Beginning in the 2000-01 school year, schools will receive both performance and improvement ratings, in each content area and for overall performance. More specifically, the first cycle of the School Performance Rating Process will:

  • Serve as a filter to identify schools that may be reviewed more extensively;
  • Focus on moving student MCAS performance out of Failing and into Proficient/Advanced;
  • Set specific improvement expectations, based on 1998 results, for each content area and for overall performance;
  • Use the average of the 1999 and 2000 results to rate performance and improvement from the baseline (1998);
  • Measure improvement using the average scaled score; and
  • Include English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics, and Science & Technology.

Performance Categories & Improvement Expectations

A school's 1998 MCAS results will place that school in a performance category for each content area and for overall performance. The baseline performance categories determine the improvement expectations.

School Performance CategoriesImprovement Expectation
CategoryPercentage of Students Scoring inIncrease average score by:
Proficient/Advanced  Failing
1 80% or more And 5% or less 1-3 points
2 60% or more And 10% or less 1-3 points
3 40% or more And 20% or less 2-4 points
4 20% or more And 40% or less 3-5 points
5 Less than 20% Or 41% - 60% 4-6 points
6    More than 60% 5-7 points

Performance & Improvement Ratings

At the end of the cycle, a school will receive performance ratings based on the average of the 1999 and 2000 results and improvement ratings based on the comparison of those results to the baseline results (1998).

Performance
Category
Rating
1 Very High
2 High
3 Moderate
4 Low
5 Very Low
6 Critically Low
 
Improvement MadeRating
More than ExpectationExceeded
Within Expectation RangeMet
Within one point below Expectation Approached
More than one point below ExpectationFailed to Meet

Interpretation of Ratings

A school's overall performance and improvement ratings will place it into one box on a 4x6 matrix. The matrix on the back of this page details the state actions associated with each box for the first cycle.

Performance 
Very High    
High    
Moderate    
Low    
Very Low    
Critically Low    
 Failed to Meet Approached Met Exceeded
 Improvement

Interpretation of Accountability Ratings - State Action Guide

OVERALL PERFORMANCE OVERALL IMPROVEMENT
Failed to Meet Approached Met Exceeded
Very High  RECOGNITION for very high performance RECOGNITION for very high performance and for meeting improvement expectations RECOGNITION for very high performance and for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program
High      RECOGNITION for high performance and for meeting improvement expectations RECOGNITION for high performance and for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program
Moderate WARNING that the school and district must strengthen improvement efforts  RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations.Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program
Low WARNING that the school and district must strengthen improvement efforts WARNING that the school and district must strengthen improvement efforts RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program
Very Low REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing. High priority for district support and targeted state assistance REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing. High priority for district support and targeted state assistance RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations.High priority for district support and targeted state assistance. RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program.High priority for district support and targeted state assistance
Critically Low REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing .Top priority for district support and targeted state assistance REFERRED FOR REVIEW to determine whether school should be declared under-performing .Top priority for district support and targeted state assistance RECOGNITION for meeting improvement expectations.High priority for district support and targeted state assistance RECOGNITION for exceeding improvement expectations. Candidate for Exemplary Schools Program. High priority for district support and targeted state assistance


last updated: December 13, 1999
E-mail this page| Print View| Print Pdf  
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Search · Site Index · Policies · Site Info · Contact ESE