The Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education

December 7, 2012

Paul Reville, Secretary of Education
Executive Office of Education
One Ashburton Place, Room 1403
Boston, MA 02108

Dear Secretary Reville:

This letter presents the Fiscal Year 2014 budget recommendations adopted by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education at its meeting on November 27, 2012. I am transmitting these budget recommendations to you in accordance with Mass. General Laws c. 69, § 1A, which reads in relevant part as follows:

The commissioner shall propose a budget to the board; said budget shall reflect the goals and objectives of the board and the secretary of education, in this chapter called the secretary. The board shall review and make recommendations regarding the budget to the secretary. The secretary shall then prepare and submit a budget request on behalf of the department to the house and senate committees on ways and means, the joint committee on education, and the secretary of administration and finance.

The Board of Elementary and Secondary Education adopted the following budget priorities for the FY 2014 education budget:

Overall Goal

Secure targeted increased funding to expand the Department's efforts to close the proficiency gap; ensure that students graduate from high school ready for college, careers, and citizenship; and maintain the Commonwealth's position as a leader in public education.

This agenda is accomplished through the following four core strategies:

The last two state budgets (FY12 & FY13) have shown a renewed commitment from state policymakers to invest in the public K-12 education system. We should build upon this commitment in the development of the Board's FY14 priorities. The need for increased state support in the next few fiscal years is critical as the Department and our districts face potential reductions from federal budget actions, as well the end of the Race to the Top Grant program during FY15.

Priority Funding Areas

  1. Continued Financial Support for Local Districts.

    • Ch. 70 - Foundation Aid

    • SPED Circuit Breaker

    • School Transportation

      • Regional

      • Homeless children

      • Non-resident vocational students

  2. Professional Development for English Language Learners Instruction

    • The Department is currently in the first year of a four-year commitment for training for teachers of academic content to English Language Learners in the Sheltered English Immersion program. FY14 marks the second year of the training initiative and an additional $2.0M is needed to train an additional 7,900 teachers, bringing the total appropriation to approximately $3.2M.

  3. Increased Assistance for District and School Turnaround

    • Targeted Assistance to Schools and Districts requires increased funding of about $2.4M, increasing the total appropriation to $10.1M, for the following purposes:

      • District and School Assistance Centers (DSACs) Resources - $0.56M in additional funding is needed to increase DSAC capacity to support high need schools and districts.

      • Grant Funding for Support to Underperforming Districts - $1.875M in additional funding will increase the Department's ability to provide services to those districts and schools in the most need of state interventions to support district, school and student improvement. Funding would be used to provide educational consulting expertise to assist with turnaround activities.

    • District Accountability Reviews - $2.4M in additional funding will provide the Department with the staff and consulting resources to perform an additional 20 district reviews. This will bring this appropriation to approximately $3.3M.

  4. Charter School Program Administration

    • The number of approved charter schools has continued to increase each year, rising from 61 in 2008 - 2009 to 77 in the current 2012 - 2013 year and, based upon the charters authorized in February 2012, 80 in the 2013 - 2014 school year. We expect the number of charter schools to continue to grow in the next few years. Given the increasing oversight and service demand, dedicated funding of $1.0M will provide the means to ensure continued high-quality administration of the Charter School Program.

  5. Eliminate Personnel Restrictions in Program Accounts

    • The Department continues to be constrained by limited funding for programmatic delivery due to the prohibition of funding staff from a number of its state appropriation accounts. The Budget Committee recommends that the Board support the request to allow the Department to fund certain program staff from specific program accounts through a change in the legislative language. These accounts include:

      • Kindergarten Grants

      • Adult Basic Education

      • Achievement Gap Closure

      • Expanded Learning Time

If you have questions about these recommendations, I would be pleased to discuss them with you.


Mitchell D. Chester, Ed.D.
Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education

C: Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Members