Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Wednesday, January 8, 2003
Contact:
Heidi B. Perlman 781-338-3106
Massachusetts’ Accountability System Approved Early, Will Be Used As Model Nationwide
WASHINGTON, D.C.
- Massachusetts’ system of school and district accountability is one of the first in the nation to be approved under No Child Left Behind, and will be held up as a model nationally for other states to consider when developing their own, federal education officials announced on Wednesday. This announcement comes one year to the day after the signing of NCLB, the sweeping federal education reform law signed by President Bush last January. Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney congratulated state officials on developing a system worthy of early national recognition. “This shows that Massachusetts is truly leading the nation in accountability and high standards in our classrooms,” he said. “This is a great tribute to the lawmakers who made Education Reform a top priority, and students, educators and parents should also be commended for this tremendous accomplishment.” Commissioner Driscoll, who flew to Washington to stand with President Bush during Wednesday’s ceremony, agreed. “From the very beginning, our approach to accountability has been to pay attention to the progress of every single student, to ensure that we can get everyone to at least a certain level,” he said. “That’s what No Child Left Behind is all about, and I am proud to say that is why we have more students reaching higher levels in Massachusetts than ever before.” All states are required to have their accountability systems approved by the federal government by the end of the 2002-2003 school year. The systems are used to gauge annually the progress of schools toward getting all students to reach proficiency in English Language Arts and mathematics by 2014, the principal goal of NCLB. Massachusetts is one of just a handful of states asked to submit their plans early. State education officials have been working with federal officials since the passage of the law to implement any changes to the school accountability system adopted by Massachusetts in 1999 needed to secure the federal approval. “By having our plan accepted so soon, Massachusetts is in a key position to play a leadership role in the further reform of public education nationally,” Commissioner Driscoll said. “I am very pleased with this outcome, and grateful to my staff for the countless hours they have put in to make this happen, particularly Juliane Dow, our Associate Commissioner for Accountability and Targeted Assistance.” The state’s system uses a proficiency index to determine if schools are making “Adequate Yearly Progress” toward the ultimate goal of all students reaching proficient by 2014. Parents with children at schools that persistently fail to make AYP can transfer their children to other schools or receive free supplemental services. Schools that fail to make AYP for several years can face serious sanctions, including state takeover. In November Massachusetts issued its second round of school performance and improvement ratings and AYP determinations. The state also assigned schools with terms to better define their standing such “critically low” or “very high.” In all, the ratings showed that during the 2001-2002 rating cycle, every high school in the state improved, with 99 percent scoring either at or above its improvement target in English and 98 percent doing so in mathematics. During the next rating cycle, to comply with NCLB, the state will also report performance for each subgroup of students in a school or district, including low-income, limited English proficient and disabled students. For more information on the state’s accountability system, look online at
www.doe.mass.edu/sda/
.
Last Updated: January 8, 2003
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top