Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, April 5, 2005
Contact:
Heidi B. Perlman 781-338-3106
Report Shows Retained Students Performed Better On MCAS The Second Time
MALDEN
- Virtually every student who repeated a grade during the 2003-2004 school year did the same or better on the MCAS exam than they did the first time they were tested, according to a new Department of Education report analyzing retention rates statewide. In all, 94 percent of the retained students who were tested both years did the same or showed some improvement in 2004 over their 2003 MCAS performance. “These results make clear that an extra year of schooling is exactly what certain students need,” said Education Commissioner David P. Driscoll. “When students are retained for the right reasons, they get time to grow so they can move forward at their own speed.” In all, 2.6 percent (23,098 students) of the 887,175 students enrolled in grades one through 12 in the 2003-2004 school year were retained and repeating a grade. This rate is the same as in 2002-2003, when 23,551 students were retained. In 1995 2 percent (16,213) of the 757,737 students enrolled in grades one through 12 were retained. Retention rates in 2004 ranged from a low of 0.6 percent in grade five to a high of 8 percent in grade nine. Students are retained when they do not complete the school’s requirements to move to the next grade. “Students should not be passing from one grade to the next simply because they’ve completed the school year. In the end, that benefits no one,” Commissioner Driscoll said. “The fact is that some students need more than 12 years.” Other findings include:
Among ethnic groups, 1.7 percent of White students were retained, as were 2.4 percent of Asians, 3.7 percent of Native Americans and 5.8 percent of African Americans and Hispanics.
At 17.1 percent, ninth grade African-American students were retained at the highest rate. No fifth grade Native American students were retained.
As has been the case for the past five years, more male students were retained than females. In all, 3.1 percent of males were held back, as compared to 2.1 percent of females.
Limited English Proficient students were retained at a higher rate than non-LEP students: 5.7 percent of LEP students were retained, as compared to 2.5 percent of non-LEP students.
Five percent of low-income students were retained, as compared to 1.7 percent of non-low income students.
The average retention rates in most cities and towns fell below five percent, with the exception of a handful of large communities, including Boston, Springfield, Chelsea and Revere. View the full report, including district results:
Last Updated: April 5, 2005
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top