Skip to main content
Skip to footer
English
Select language, current language English
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
ELL Assessment Update: 2016 ACCESS for ELLs Reported Results, Standard Setting, and Revised Reclassification Criteria for 2016–2017
To:
District ELL Program Directors
From:
Dan Wiener, Administrator of Inclusive Assessment, Student Assessment Services
Paul Aguiar, Director, Office of English Language Acquisition and Academic Achievement
Date:
November 28, 2016
Massachusetts administered the
ACCESS for ELLs 2.0
(English proficiency assessment) for the first time in January and February 2016, using a combination of computer- and paper-based forms for students in grades 1–12. The test will be administered again in January–February 2017.
Standard Setting for ACCESS 2.0
Last summer, WIDA, supported by their partner, The Center for Applied Linguistics, conducted a "standard setting" study during which new "cut scores" were determined that define the lower and upper limits of each proficiency level on the new ACCESS 2.0 tests. Prior to the release of the 2015–2016 ACCESS results, the WIDA Technical Advisory Committee and the WIDA Executive Committee had recommended that the 2016 results be reported using the current (i.e., the ACCESS 1.0) cut scores in order not to delay the reporting of ACCESS results until late fall 2016. As a result, the 2016 ACCESS 2.0 results were calculated using cut scores from the previous version of the ACCESS tests. We are writing to inform you of the results of the standard setting study and to offer advice on possible next steps. Recently, WIDA released its recommendations for new cut scores for 2016–2017 and beyond, which have now been adopted by WIDA member states, and will be used beginning in 2016–2017. The full WIDA Standard Setting Report will be available shortly at
wida.us
. Data from the standard setting report indicate that, on average,
the 2015–2016 results were reported about one-half to one full proficiency level higher
than would have been reported if the new cut scores had been used, resulting in somewhat inflated proficiency levels for many students. As a result of the reported scores, some English language learner (ELL) students may have been exited from English language services prematurely. We urge districts to
monitor the progress of those students
carefully and, if needed, re-enroll them in language service programs where observations and other evidence warrant this, according to the policies and procedures outlined in the
Guidance on Identification, Assessment, Placement, and Reclassification of English Language Learners
. The results of the ACCESS standard setting process last summer and fall yielded the following general information about the reporting of 2015–2016 ACCESS scores:
Reading
test results were reported:
about one-half proficiency level (PL) too high in grades 1–6; and
about one PL too high, between Levels 3 and 6, in grades 7–12.
Listening
results were reported accurately.
Speaking
results were reported:
about one PL too high, between Levels 3 and 6, in grades 3–6; and
one-and-a-half to 2 PLs too high, for all proficiency levels, in grades 7–12.
Writing
results were reported:
accurately in grades 1, 2, 7, and 8; and
about one-half PL too high in grades 3–6 and 9–12.
Overall
results were reported about one-half PL too high.
Looking ahead to the reporting of 2016–2017 ACCESS results, the application of the new cut scores will have a likely impact on student results in one or more of the following ways: individual scale and proficiency level scores may likely be somewhat
lower in 2017
in the Speaking and Writing domains, in the Oral Language and Literacy composite scores, and in the student's overall scale scores and proficiency levels. The Student Growth Percentiles for ACCESS (SGPAs) are unlikely to change dramatically in 2016–2017.
Student Reclassification Criteria for 2016–2017
In response to the information presented in the Standard Setting Report, the Department will modify the exit (reclassification) criteria for the 2016–2017 school year, as shown below. For the 2016–2017 school year only, districts may consider reclassifying students who achieve ACCESS scores of:
4.0 or higher in the domains of Writing and Speaking, and
5.0 or higher in Listening and Reading
Students who were exited in 2015–2016 under the previous exit criteria need not be reconsidered under the new criteria, but should be monitored carefully for their progress in English-speaking classrooms. Once the 2016–2017 ACCESS scores are released and an analysis concluded, the OELAAA will review the exit criteria with its stakeholders, and make additional adjustments as needed. Districts will be kept informed as information and decisions become available. Contact the Office of English Language Acquisition and Academic Achievement with questions regarding the placement and reclassification of English learners at
ell@doe.mass.edu
or by phone at 781 338-3584. Please contact Student Assessment Services with any questions regarding ACCESS results or standard setting at either
access@doe.mass.edu
or by phone at 781-338-3625. Thank you for your attention to this important information.
Last Updated: November 29, 2016
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top