Administration and Finance
Commissioner's Office
District Support
Educational Options
Instructional Support
Kaleidoscope Collective
Legal
Planning and Research
Strategic Initiatives
Student Assessment
The Problem Resolution System office will be publishing an ongoing series of Case Studies to illustrate particular aspects of compliance which would benefit from clarification or elaboration based on the results of our complaints investigations and findings. Please feel free to contact the PRS office if you have any questions regarding these materials at 781-338-3700 or at Compliance@doe.mass.edu.
Discipline
Discipline procedures - Due process-Emergency removal
Student is an 11 year old boy in 6th grade with an IEP. Student attends sub-separate classes and requires supports including a behavior intervention plan. On a particular day, he engaged in various unsafe behaviors in the classroom including kicking, spitting, destroying school property, and hitting a staff member and a peer.
As a result of these behaviors, the District decided to impose an emergency removal. The District orally notified the student and the parent that there will be an emergency removal of the student for that day and the next two school days and the basis for it. The District also provided a written Notice of Emergency Removal and then proceeds to impose the emergency removal. Because they did not anticipate any supplemental suspension beyond the 2 day removal, the District did not provide an opportunity to the student and parent for a hearing to discuss the removal.
The district was out of compliance with 603 CMR 53.07.
Although the district had no intention of suspending the student beyond the term of the emergency removal, they failed to implement required due process by not providing the opportunity for a hearing to discuss the emergency removal itself in violation of the regulatory requirement in 603 CMR 53.07(c) and (d)….
Citation: 603 CMR 53.07
While the District determined that the student's behavior that day "posed a danger to persons or property, (and) materially and substantially disrupted the order of the school, and in the principal's judgment there (was) no alternative available to alleviate the danger or disruption" as required by the regulation and made immediate and reasonable efforts to orally notify the parent and sent a written notice to parents and student, the District erred in failing to provide notice of the right to a hearing and hold a due process hearing for an emergency removal before two school days expire following the day of the removal.