Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Friday, October 21, 2005
Contact:
Heidi B. Perlman 781-338-3106
Dropout Rate Increase Prompts Call For More Student Engagement
MALDEN
- The dropout rate for high schoolers hit a high during the 2003-2004 school year, prompting Education Commissioner David P. Driscoll to renew his call for educators to do more to keep students engaged in their learning. In his bi-monthly email message to Superintendents, Education Commissioner David P. Driscoll on Friday asked district leaders to do a careful analysis of why students dropped out in their communities, and to report their findings back to the Department of Education. These findings will be used to develop a set of statewide strategies to address the problem. "We owe it to our young people to build a system that will ensure every single one of our students feels connected to and engaged in their learning and gets the support they need to reach full success in high school and graduate," he said. "This is, quite simply, our responsibility as educators." According to the Department of Education report released Friday, the 2003-2004 dropout rate rose to 3.7 percent, a slight increase from 2002-2003, when the rate was 3.3 percent. In all, 10,633 students in grades 9-12 dropped out during the 2003-2004 school year. When broken down by class, this translates into 2.6 percent of freshmen, 3.7 percent of sophomores, 4 percent of juniors and 4.8 percent of high school seniors. Of the 2,736 juniors who dropped out that year, 55 percent had not yet earned their competency determination. Of the 2,976 seniors who dropped out, 35 percent had not yet earned their competency determination. Driscoll said he was concerned by the increase in dropouts, particularly at the junior and senior level. "What these numbers show is that MCAS is not primarily what is prompting our students to drop out," he said. "We need to study the numbers carefully over the next few years and find out the exact reasons why they are quitting. Some may have family circumstances or job issues, or perhaps this increase is a result of more accurate data collection. Regardless, it is clear that too many teenagers do not feel a positive connection to their schooling, and this must not continue." In the 2002-2003 school year, the dropout rate was 3.3 percent, or 9,389 students. This translated into 2.6 percent of freshmen, 3.6 percent of sophomores, 3.7 percent of juniors and 3.5 percent of seniors. The 2000-2001 national dropout rate, according to the latest report by the National Center for Education Statistics, was 5 percent. The 2003-2004 dropout rate was calculated based on enrollment figures reported through the Student Information Management System (SIMS) by each district on Oct. 1, 2003 and Oct. 1, 2004. A dropout is defined as a student in grade 9-12 who leaves school prior to graduation for reasons other than to transfer to another school, and does not re-enroll before the following Oct. 1. This is the third year that SIMS data has been used to calculate the dropout rate. Data collected using SIMS is considered more accurate than the data the state was able to collect before the system was developed. SIMS requires districts to submit individual student data, while the prior system required districts to submit only data in the aggregate. Other statewide findings include:
Black and Hispanic students dropped out at a higherrate than White and Asian students in grades 9-12. Overall, Hispanic students dropped out at the highest rate in every grade: 6.6 percent in grade 9, 9.3 percent in grade 10, 8.1 percent in grade 11 and 10.1 percent in grade 12.
18.2 percent of the students who were retained inthe 2003-2004 school year dropped out.
As has been the trend in previous years, more malesthan females dropped out: 4.3 percent (6,291) of male students dropped out, as compared to 3.1 percent (4,342) of female high schoolers.
5.7 percent (3,692) of low income students droppedout, as compared to 3.1 percent (6,941) of students who are not classified as low income.
5.4 percent (2,223)of special education studentsdropped out, as compared to 3.4 percent (8,410) of general education students.
View the full report
Last Updated: October 21, 2005
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top