Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Educator Effectiveness
Federal "Highly Qualified" Teacher June 30th Deadline
To:
Superintendents, Charter School Leaders and Principals
From:
David P. Driscoll, Commissioner of Education
Date:
June 8, 2006
The federal "No Child Left Behind" Act requires all teachers of the core academic subjects to be designated as "highly qualified" in each of the core academic subjects that they teach by June 30, 2006. Teachers are deemed "highly qualified" if they: 1) possess a bachelor's degree; 2) possess a Massachusetts teaching license at any level; and 3) have demonstrated subject matter competency in each of the core subjects they teach using specific options outlined in the federal legislation. Instructional paraprofessionals in Title I targeted assistance and school-wide programs also need to meet a specific set of minimum qualification requirements by June 30, 2006. The requirements for instructional paraprofessionals include possession of a high school diploma or equivalent and one of the following: an Associate's degree (or higher); 48 credit hours at an institution of higher education; successful completion of a local assessment (as defined by MA DOE); or successful completion of a state assessment (ParaPro or WorkKeys tests). In my March 6, 2006 memo, I informed districts that teachers who are not "highly qualified" by the June 30, 2006 deadline must continue to work toward achieving "highly qualified" status. Currently federal law and policy guidance are silent regarding the consequences for districts, teachers and paraprofessionals who do not meet the federal requirements by the June 30, 2006 deadline. At this juncture, the decision whether to continue the employment of these educators is local and is not driven by federal or state policy related to highly qualified status or completion of the paraprofessional requirements. Districts should continue to provide support to individuals who still need to meet the requirements and should ensure that the schools within the district and the district as a whole continue to work toward the goal of 100% highly qualified in the 2006/2007 school year.
Update Regarding the Federal June 30, 2006 Deadline
The United States Department of Education recently stated that it is evaluating each state to determine if a "good-faith effort" is being made toward achieving the 100% "highly qualified" goal by the June deadline. If states have been making this effort, then: 1) federal funding will not be impacted; and 2) states will be required to submit a revised state plan outlining how they will ensure that those individuals not highly qualified by June 30, 2006 will be highly qualified by June 30, 2007. While this is not an extension of the deadline, it is an opportunity for those making a "good-faith effort" to outline the specific steps that will be taken to ensure that all teachers are highly qualified by June 30, 2007. Massachusetts and eleven other states were only recently reviewed by U.S.ED. Hence, these states have not yet heard from U.S.ED about their standings in relation to the "good-faith effort" review and opportunity to submit a revised plan. It is my belief that Massachusetts will most likely be found to be making a "good-faith effort" and will be given the opportunity to submit a revised plan. If we are given this opportunity, our plan will outline specific strategies and initiatives that the Department as well as districts and schools will undertake to ensure that those remaining teachers and paraprofessionals who did not meet the requirements by June 30, 2006 are able to meet the requirements by June 30, 2007. The Department is fully aware that the 100% "highly qualified" goal may be a moving target due to the many personnel changes that take place in a district and school such as retirements, leaves, change of assignments, etc. However, we need to make our best effort as a state to ensure that we are making sound educational decisions for our students and upholding the goals and requirements of Education Reform and the federal law. If you have questions, please contact Simone Lynch at 781-338-6680 or
slynch@doe.mass.edu
.
Last Updated: June 14, 2006
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top