Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
Contact:
Heidi B. Perlman 781-338-3106
2006 SAT Results Show First Decline in 14 Years
MALDEN
- Massachusetts’ students had the highest math score of any state with more than 80 percent of students participating on the 2006 SAT, but ultimately showed an overall decline in performance on both the critical reading and math exams. After 14 years of steady progress, 2006 results showed that the state’s students dropped seven points in reading to an average of 513, dropped three points in math to an average of 524, and scored a 510 on the new Writing exam. National results also dropped five points in reading to an average of 503, dropped two points in math to an average of 518, and students averaged 497 on the Writing exam. The 2006 SAT was the first ever to include a Writing component in addition to the Reading and Math tests, adding an additional 45 minutes to the testing time. College Board officials said some of the national decline in performance could be either test fatigue, or a result of some students choosing to retain their 2005 results and not re-take the test in 2006. Education Commissioner David P. Driscoll called the decline “disturbing,” but agreed with the College Board’s explanations and cautioned against being too concerned over results from a single year. “One year of declining results does not erase the 14 years of steady progress we have made on the SAT,” he said. “While any drop in performance is unsettling, without a multi-year drop in our numbers it is impossible to tell if this is the start of a downward trend, or merely a blip we will make up next year. Regardless, this is something we will watch closely over the coming school year.” In all, 85 percent of Massachusetts’ public and private high school seniors participated in the 2006 SAT. Nationally just New York had a higher participation rate, with 88 percent participation. Massachusetts was third in participation among just public school students. In all, 79 percent participated here, as compared to 80 percent in the District of Columbia, and 82 percent in New York. Nationwide 48 percent of all students and 41 percent of public school students participated. Public school students also showed a decline in performance, dropping seven points to 506 in Critical Reading, and four points to 518 in Math, and scoring a 502 on the Writing exam. Nationally public school students also showed a decline, dropping 5 points to 500 on the Reading exam, dropping 1 point to 514 on the Math and scoring a 492 on the Writing exam. Statewide, the achievement gap was still evident in results broken down by ethnicity: Asian students scored a 506 in Reading, a 577 in Math and a 508 in Writing; Black students scored a 430 in Reading, a 430 in Math and a 426 in Writing; Hispanic students scored a 444 in Reading, a 447 in Math and a 437 in Writing; White students scored a 525 in Reading, 534 in Math and a 523 in Writing. However, participation rates showed a significant increase in the percentage of minority students who took the SAT in 2006 from the previous year: Black participation went up 7.9 percent statewide and 11 percent among public school students; Hispanic participation went up 6 percent statewide and 8 percent among public school students. Overall performance among Black and Hispanic students decreased somewhat, but not significantly: Black students dropped 1 point in Reading and 3 points in Math; Hispanic students gained 3 points in Reading and dropped 2 points in Math. “I am pleased to see the participation rates of our minority students increasing, but this achievement gap to me is more concerning than the state’s overall decline. All of our students – regardless of race – need to be making progress and unfortunately, in this area, we are far from achieving that goal.” Advanced Placement (AP) results showed a statewide 7.3 percent increase in the number of students taking the exams, and a 9.7 percent increase in the number of tests that received a score of a 3 or higher. AP exams are graded on a 1-5 scale. Among public school students, results showed a 7.6 percent increase in test-takers and a 10.7 percent increase in the number of tests that received a score of 3 or higher. PSAT results showed a statewide 10 percent increase in the number of sophomores who took the exam. Students bested the national average, scoring a 45.2 in Reading, 46.9 in math and 47.1 in Writing. Among public school students, participation went up 11.3 percent, and sophomores also bested the national average, scoring a 44.1 in Reading, a 46.2 in Math and a 45.9 in Writing. Other public school findings include:
The number of Black students who took at least one AP exam went up 19 percent, and the number who scored a 3 or higher went up 51 percent. Nationally the number who were tested went up 17 percent and 15 percent scored a 3 or higher.
The number of Hispanics who took at least one AP exam went up 22 percent, and the number who scored a 3 or higher went up 14 percent. Nationally the number who were tested went up 12 percent and 10 percent scored a 3 or higher.
The top five college majors students indicated plans to pursue were: business and commerce (16 percent), health and allied services (15 percent), social science and history (10 percent), visual and performing arts (9 percent), and education (8 percent).
26 percent plan to pursue a Bachelor’s degree, 27 percent plan to pursue a Master’s degree, 13 percent plan to pursue a Doctoral degree.
Test-takers asked that their results be sent to a total of 2,044 different colleges and universities nationwide. The top five were University of Massachusetts at Amherst (37.8 percent), Northeastern University (21.4 percent), Boston University (17.3 percent), University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth (14.4 percent), Bridgewater State College (13.3 percent).
Last Updated: August 29, 2006
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top