Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Wednesday, August 30, 2006
Contact:
Heidi B. Perlman 781-338-3106
Study Finds Most Charter Schools Meet or Exceed Performance of Sending Districts
Malden
- Nearly 90 percent of the state's charter schools performed the same or better on MCAS than schools in their comparison sending districts between 2001 and 2005, with just 10 percent doing worse, according to a new study analyzing charter school performance. The study was conducted by the National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Inc., at the request of the Department of Education. The findings are analytical in nature and do not attempt to explain the reasons for the different levels of performance. Researchers compared MCAS results in English and math between individual charter schools and their comparison sending districts and examined student growth over time for individual students enrolled in charter schools. "Too often the question of whether or not charter schools are successful becomes a politically-charged debate," said Education Commissioner David P. Driscoll. "We chose to have this analysis done to put an end to that debate once and for all. Now that the questions have been answered, our next steps will be to determine exactly what charter schools are doing differently and how their successes can benefit the traditional public schools." The study had two phases. The first phase looked at direct comparisons of 2001 to 2005 MCAS results in English Language Arts and mathematics between individual charter schools and their comparison sending districts (CSD). The second phase used a statistical technique called hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to examine changes in individual student test scores for continuously enrolled students over time.
Phase One
In all, 52 of the state's 56 charter schools operating in 2004-2005 were included in this study. Of that group, six had more than one comparison sending district. Major findings of the first phase of the study include:
When there is a statistically significant difference in MCAS performance, it is much more likely to favor the charter school.
In both ELA and Mathematics, at least 30 percent of the charter schools performed statistically significantly higher than their CSD in each year with the exception of 2001. In 2001, 19 percent of the charter schools performed significantly higher than their CSD in ELA and 26 percent did so in Mathematics.
The percentage of charter schools performing higher than their CSD each year has remained fairly constant in ELA and Mathematics, even while the number of charter schools and the number of students tested in charter schools has increased.
The percentage of charter schools performing lower than their CSD has declined to approximately 10 percent in Mathematics and to below 10 percent in ELA.
Similar patterns existed for all demographic subgroups, with the likelihood of the significant difference favoring the charter school being most prevalent for the African American, Hispanic, and Low Income subgroups.
Phase Two
In the second phase, researchers applied HLM to MCAS scaled scores for all students in the state continuously enrolled in a school district or charter school to generate growth scores for achievement across years. In English Language Arts:
Statewide, for all schools and districts, average growth in MCAS scores across grades and years from 2001 to 2005 improved about 1.10 scaled score points per year.
Ten charter schools and no CSDs had growth scores greater than 2.1 points (or more than 1 point above the state average).
Six charter schools had growth scores that exceeded their CSD by 1 or more points, while six charter schools had growth scores lower than their CSD by 1 or more points.
In Mathematics:
Statewide, for all charter and non-charter schools, average growth in MCAS across grades and years from 2001 to 2005 was modest: 1.51 scaled score points per year.
Ten charter schools and one CSD had growth scores greater than 2.51 (or more than 1 point above the state average).
Fourteen charter schools had growth scores that exceeded their CSD by 1 or more points, while five charter schools had growth scores lower than their CSD by 1 or more points.
The Center for Assessment is an independent, non-profit organization with extensive experience in conducting statistical analyses of student performance data. The Center has previously conducted studies for over 25 states, the Council of Chief State School Officers, the US Department of Education, and other organizations.
Last Updated: August 30, 2006
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top