Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
The Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education
Board of Education Votes
To:
Superintendents and Charter School Leaders
From:
Education Commissioner David P. Driscoll
Date:
October 26, 2006
The Board of Education voted on October 24 to require all students to either reach or strive for Proficiency on MCAS. The goal of this decision is the right one: We need to do whatever we can to encourage our students to achieve at higher levels. This change leaves the passing score at 220, but requires students who pass but haven't made it to Proficient to take courses and additional assessments that will move them in the right direction. Unfortunately, the media vastly mischaracterized this vote. The newspapers, TV and radio have reported that the Board voted to "increase the passing score to 240." I am writing to clear up any confusion resulting from the inaccurate coverage.
New Competency Determination Regulations
Let me be clear: the Board did
not
increase the MCAS passing score. Instead, members voted to create an "either/or" scenario for all students. Beginning with the Class of 2010:
Students will be required to
either
meet or exceed a scaled score of 240 on both the Grade 10 ELA and Math MCAS exams;
or
Students will be required to meet or exceed a scaled score of 220 on both the Grade 10 ELA and Math exams and fulfill the requirements of an Educational Proficiency Plan (EPP).
Each EPP will include, at a minimum: a review of the student's strengths and weaknesses, based on MCAS and other assessment results, coursework, grades and teacher input; the courses the student will be required to take and successfully complete in grades 11 and 12; and a description of the assessments the school will regularly administer to determine if the student is moving toward proficiency. In 2006, 84 percent of 10th graders scored at least a 220 on the English and Math MCAS exams, earning their competency determination on their first try. Statewide 59 percent of 10th graders scored Proficient or higher on both exams, up from 54 percent in 2005 and just 38 percent in 2001. This means that if the regulations were in place this year, about 40 percent of students would require EPPs. As part of their vote, the Board also reaffirmed the addition of Science, Technology and Engineering to the competency determination requirement beginning with the Class of 2010, and voted to add History beginning with the Class of 2012.
Certificate of Mastery
The Stanley Z. Koplik Certificate of Mastery was established by the Board in 1997 to recognize high academic achievement on MCAS, in high school, and in competitions and student publications. Recipients of the certificate have received four years of free tuition at any of the state's public colleges or the University of Massachusetts. The Board made changes to the certificate on Tuesday to reposition it to clearly indicate college and career-readiness, rather than solely academic achievement. To earn the Certificate under the new requirements, students must:
Score Proficient or higher on the Grade 10 ELA and Math exams
Maintain at least a 3.0 grade point average in grades 11 and 12
Pass an Algebra II test that will be identified by the Department.
Demonstrate proficiency in writing through an assessment that will be identified by the Department.
Either complete a high school curriculum designed to prepare students for college- and career-readiness,
or
earn a Certificate of Occupational Proficiency.
The Board renamed the existing Certificate of Mastery the "Certificate of Mastery with Distinction," and maintained the existing requirements to qualify. The Department intends to work with the Board of Higher Education to establish incentives to strive for the repositioned Certificate of Mastery. If you have further questions about any of these issues please contact me.
Last Updated: November 1, 2006
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top