Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Security Portal
|
School Profiles
Menu
Administration and Finance
Accounting and Auditing
Chapter 70 Program
Chapter 74 Nonresident Tuition
Charter Finance and Enrollment
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Budget
Federal Grant Programs
Food and Nutrition
Grants/Funding Opportunities
Inter-District School Choice
Regional Districts
School Buildings
School Finance Regulations
Special Ed. Circuit Breaker
Transportation
Commissioner's Office
About the Commissioner
Back to School
Commissioner's Update
Education Leaders Checklist
Special Advisories
Strategic Plan
District Support
Accountability Lists, Materials, and Tools
Approved Special Education Schools
Boston Public Schools Systemic Improvement Plan (
SIP
)
Chronically Underperforming Schools and Districts
Data and Accountability
District Reviews
District Review Reports
Language Access
Leading Educational Access Project (
LEAP
)
Multi-Tiered System of Support (
MTSS
)
Public School Monitoring
School and District Profiles
School and District Report Cards
Special Education
Special Education in Institutional Settings
Statewide System of Support
Student Opportunity Act
Educational Options
Adult and Community Learning Services
Alternative Education
Advanced Placement
AP
Subsidy Program
Career Technical Education (
CTE
)
Charter Schools
College Career, and Technical Education
Commonwealth Virtual Schools
Dropout Prevention and Reengagement
Early College
Educational Collaboratives
Family Portal
High School Equivalency (
HSE
)
Home Schooling
Innovation Career Pathways
Inter-District School Choice
Mass Academy of Math and Science at
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
WPI
Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity
METCO
Problem Resolution System
Public School Districts
Recovery High Schools
School Finder
School Redesign
Student and Family Support
Instructional Support
Acceleration Roadmap
Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Practices
Curriculum Ratings by Teachers
CURATE
Educator Effectiveness
Educator Evaluation
Educator Licensure
Educator Preparation
Educator Recognition
English Learner Education
Equitable Access
Induction and Mentoring
Instructional Materials
Learning Standards
Literacy and Humanities
Mass Literacy
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
Performance Assessment for Leaders
PAL
Professional Development
Professional Learning
Rethinking Equity and Teaching for English Language Learners
RETELL
Social and Emotional Learning
Science, Technology Engineering, and Mathematics
STEM
Talent Guide
Teacher Leadership
World Languages
Kaleidoscope Collective
What is Deeper Learning?
Planning for Deeper Learning
Legal
Arbitration Awards
Federal Laws
Legal Advisories
Litigation Reports
State Laws
State Regulations
Planning and Research
Planning for Success
Research and Evaluation
Resource Allocation
Strategic Initiatives
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
DEI
Policies and Practices at
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
DESE
Diverse Workforce
Equitable Student Access
Student Assessment
John and Abigail Adams Scholarship
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Accessibility and Accommodations
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Alternate Assessment
National/International Tests
Parent/Guardian Information
Stanley Z. Koplik Award
Training Opportunities
Why Testing Matters
World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment
WIDA
Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State
ACCESS
Board of Education
News and Media
Data and Accountability
Family Portal
Educators and Administrators
Public Awareness Campaigns
Most Requested
Licensure
Learning Standards
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System
MCAS
Educator Evaluation
Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure
MTEL
For Immediate Release
Wednesday, October 17, 2001
Contact:
Heidi B. Perlman, 781-338-3106 or Jonathan Palumbo, 781-338-3105
Independent Review Applauds Quality of Massachusetts' Educational Standards and Tests
Boston
- Massachusetts' system of academic standards and high-stakes testing is one of the best-designed in the country, and its 10th grade exam stands out as a national example of success, according to a new independent evaluation by education experts. Achieve, Inc., a bipartisan, nonprofit national organization, has completed in-depth evaluations of the standards in nine other states, and found Massachusetts to be the only one with both high standards and a quality exam. State education officials and Achieve President Robert Schwartz released the report at a press conference on Wednesday. "We're impressed with the strong foundation Massachusetts has built to help educators improve student performance," Schwartz said. "It's a solid example for policymakers across the country." Achieve's six-month study compared Massachusetts' K–12 mathematics to standards from around the world. Researchers also analyzed the alignment and rigor of the 10th grade Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System exams in English and mathematics. The state's English standards were not reviewed because Achieve determined in a previous review that they are among the best in the nation and uses them as "exemplary standards" in its benchmarking work with other states. Overall, researchers determined that the MCAS math and English grade 10 exams are the best exit exams they have reviewed. "Most states are putting in place new graduation exams that measure higher standards," Schwartz said. "They should look to Massachusetts for guidance. Its 10th-grade standards and exams are well conceived and well connected." Massachusetts Governor Jane Swift lauded the strength of the exam, and the accomplishments of the state's students. State results from the 2001 administration of the test showed that failure rates on the 10th grade mathematics and English exam dropped dramatically last spring, the first time students were tested knowing high stakes were involved. "The MCAS test was designed to challenge all of our students at all levels," she said. "I have seen firsthand the creative and innovative changes the exam has spurred in classrooms all across our state and am grateful to the educators who are working hard to help students meet the high expectations we have set for them. Achieve's findings confirm what policymakers in Massachusetts have known -- our standard is world-class." Achieve commended Massachusetts for standards that are clear, well written and challenging. It said the 10th-grade tests were appropriately rigorous and very well matched to the standards they were designed to measure. In previous benchmarking reviews, Achieve has found only two states with well-designed tests and no others with such strong alignment between the standards and tests. Achieve encouraged state leaders to focus on three technical improvements. Most importantly, reviewers said the English language arts 10th-grade test focused too much on literature at the expense of nonfiction or informational items. The state should ensure the tests measure students' ability to read both fiction and nonfiction texts. Second, reviewers said the 10th-grade mathematics test included a number of questions ostensibly measuring student knowledge of numbers but that are more tightly aligned to algebra concepts. The state should ensure an appropriate balance among mathematical areas in subsequent rounds of testing. "Massachusetts has proceeded deliberately and thoughtfully as it's worked for the past decade to raise expectations for students," said Massachusetts Board of Education Chairman James Peyser. "This review helps confirm what we see as our strength, and guide us toward areas where we need to improve." Achieve's study was prompted by a request from the Massachusetts Department of Education earlier this year. "Standards, and assessments to measure those standards, are the foundation of school improvement efforts in our state. We want to ensure our tools are the very best they can be and do the best job possible preparing students to be successful," said Education Commissioner David P. Driscoll. "We're proud of the report's overall findings and look forward to addressing the issues Achieve has raised." In addition to the benchmarking review, Achieve also is conducting a "policy review" of the state's efforts to improve school accountability, help students and schools meet the standards, and communicate with the public about these changes. The report will be completed in late fall. Similar studies are underway in Maryland, Oklahoma and Texas. In past years, Achieve has completed comparable studies in Illinois, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Minnesota, Oregon, and Wisconsin. Established in 1996, Achieve is an independent, bipartisan, nonprofit organization created by governors and business leaders to help states improve standards and performance in America's schools. Achieve works primarily with state leaders and serves as a clearinghouse and resource center on education standards, testing and accountability issues. It has offices in Cambridge, Mass., and Washington, D.C.
Last Updated: October 17, 2001
This link will take you to an external website which may or may not be accessible and WCAG 2.1 compliant
Top